When Multi-City Vietnam Itineraries Help — and When They Hurt Your Visa

Your Vietnam visa file lands on a desk, and the itinerary gets scanned first: entry city, exit city, and whether your dates behave. A neat Hanoi to Da Nang to Ho Chi Minh route can look normal. A jumpy chain with tight connections can look manufactured. We see refusals and delays triggered by nothing more than a flight sequence that does not add up. Using a dummy ticket can help create a verifiable, flexible itinerary without financial commitment.

In this guide, we help you decide when a multi-city itinerary strengthens your Vietnam application and when a simple round-trip or open-jaw works better. We walk you through building a believable route, spacing legs so one change does not break the story, and spotting the red flags that raise questions fast. For your Vietnam multi-city route, use a dummy ticket that keeps entry, internal hops, and exit dates consistent. Check our FAQ for more on how dummy tickets work, explore our blogs for visa tips, and learn about us at About Us.
 

Multi-city itinerary for Vietnam visa is increasingly common in 2026—but only when done correctly. Avoid unnecessary visa delays and financial loss by using a verifiable itinerary instead of purchasing multiple non-refundable tickets. 🌍 It clearly explains your travel flow (entry, internal movement, and exit) while staying compliant with embassy review standards.

A professionally prepared multi-city itinerary for Vietnam visa ensures consistent dates, logical routing, and matching accommodation details—reducing red flags during assessment. Pro Tip: Your first entry city and final exit city must always align with your visa application form. 👉 Get a verified itinerary now and apply with confidence.

Last updated: January 2026 — Verified against Vietnam embassy practices, airline transit rules, and recent applicant outcomes.

When preparing for a Vietnam visa application, early-stage planning is crucial to avoid common pitfalls that lead to delays or rejections. One effective way to manage this is by generating temporary flight itineraries that serve as proof of travel without committing to actual bookings. This approach allows you to outline your multi-city route—such as starting in Hanoi, moving to Da Nang, and ending in Ho Chi Minh City—while keeping flexibility for changes. Tools designed for this purpose can create realistic reservations with verifiable PNR codes, ensuring your documents align with embassy requirements. By using a dummy airline ticket generator with PNR, you eliminate financial risks associated with cancellable flights, as these placeholders are affordable and can be adjusted unlimited times. This method not only simplifies the visa process but also builds a coherent travel story that reviewers can quickly validate. Remember to incorporate supporting documents like hotel bookings to strengthen your case. Ultimately, starting with a solid, risk-free itinerary sets the foundation for a smooth application, encouraging you to explore more resources for tailored advice and proceed confidently with your submission.

When A Multi-City Vietnam Itinerary Looks Normal Vs. When It Looks Suspicious

A Vietnam visa itinerary can look perfectly reasonable with three cities, or it can look questionable with two. The difference is not “multi-city” itself. The difference is whether your flights create a clean, believable travel story that holds up when someone checks the sequence quickly. Incorporating a dummy ticket ensures your itinerary remains flexible and verifiable.

The “Story” Your Flights Need To Tell In 15 Seconds

Visa teams often scan your itinerary fast. They want to understand your trip without doing detective work.

A normal-looking Vietnam route usually answers three questions immediately:

• Where do you enter Vietnam?

• What is the travel direction while you are there?

• Where do you exit Vietnam?

If your flights show a clear direction, your itinerary feels human. If your flights bounce around, it can look assembled.

Here is what typically reads as natural:

• You land in Hanoi, spend time in the north, then move to Da Nang, and finish in Ho Chi Minh City.

• You land in Ho Chi Minh City, work your way north, and exit from Hanoi.

• You land in one city, move once, then leave from the last city you actually plan to be in.

Here is what makes a reviewer pause:

• Teleporting days: Hanoi in the morning, Phu Quoc by afternoon, Da Nang the next morning, Ho Chi Minh City the same night.

• Backtracking: Hanoi → Ho Chi Minh City → Hanoi again, without a clear reason.

• Overpacked rhythm: a flight every single day, all at similar times, with no breathing room.

A simple test works well before you submit anything. Read your itinerary like a stranger and ask: “Would we believe this person can actually take these flights on these dates?”

If the answer feels shaky, the fix is usually not a new city. The fix is a clearer sequence and better spacing. Using dummy tickets allows you to test multiple scenarios without cost.

Vietnam-Specific Logic: Entry/Exit Coherence Beats Number Of Cities

For Vietnam, the strongest part of your flight plan is usually the bookends. Your first arrival and your final departure carry the most weight.

A multi-city itinerary looks stable when:

• Your arrival city matches your first planned stop

• Your departure city matches your last planned stop

• Your trip length matches the number of movements

Even if your internal plan changes later, these bookends can still look consistent if the story stays intact.

A common credibility issue is not the number of flights. It is an exit that does not align with the trip.

Examples of clean exit logic:

• Final day in Ho Chi Minh City, and your flight leaves from SGN.

• Final day in Hanoi, and your flight leaves from HAN.

• Final day in Da Nang, and your flight leaves from DAD.

Examples that can trigger questions:

• You claim you end in Ho Chi Minh City, but your exit flight is from Hanoi the next morning, with no time to reposition.

• You exit from a city you never planned to visit, or you visit it for only a few hours.

We also watch for “stranded” endings. Your last segment should clearly get you out of Vietnam. A chain that ends with a vague stop or an unrealistic connection can make the file feel unfinished. For more on international travel guidelines, see the IATA website.

What Triggers Doubt Fast: Timing Math, Airport Realism, And Connection Behavior

Most itinerary issues come from time math. Reviewers do not need to be aviation experts to spot when your plan does not breathe.

These are common timing problems that weaken a Vietnam multi-city plan:

• Same-day stacking: international arrival, then an internal flight a few hours later, then another movement the next morning.

• Too-tight connections: you built a route that only works if everything runs perfectly.

• No recovery space: one delay breaks the whole chain.

A safer pattern is to keep internal hops at least a day apart unless your itinerary truly demands speed.

Airport choices matter too. If you say “Da Nang” but the flight shows an airport that does not align with your stated stop, it can look careless. The same applies if you show an internal hop that does not match your travel narrative.

Connection behavior can also look odd when it feels like you optimized for paper instead of travel.

Watch for:

• Unnecessary third-country detours that add long travel time for no reason

• Multiple connections for short distances that most travelers would fly direct

• Routes that bounce through hubs in a way that does not match your stated cities

You do not need a “perfect” itinerary. You need a route that looks like something a real person would choose when planning a Vietnam trip. Dummy tickets can help simulate these routes effectively.

Choosing Between Multi-City, Round-Trip, And Open-Jaw For Vietnam

Here, we focus on picking the structure that fits your trip and keeps your file simple.

Use multi-city when:

• You will enter Vietnam in one city and leave from another

• You plan at least one internal flight that you want reflected clearly

• You have enough days to make the movements feel normal

Use round-trip when:

• You plan to base yourself mainly in one hub (Hanoi or Ho Chi Minh City)

• Your other stops are flexible, short, or by ground transport

• You want the cleanest structure with the fewest moving parts

Use open-jaw when:

• You arrive in one city and depart from another

• You expect to move overland between them

• You want a “multi-city feel” without listing several internal flights

Now add a practical rule that reduces risk for many applicants: the more uncertain your dates, the fewer chained segments you should submit. A route that needs three legs to stay consistent can break quickly if one date changes. Expand on this by considering how dummy tickets allow unlimited adjustments, ensuring your plan remains intact even with shifts in scheduling. This flexibility is key for applicants dealing with unpredictable visa processing times or personal commitments.

Build A Multi-City Flight Reservation Pack That Doesn’t Collapse Under Scrutiny

Once you choose a multi-city shape for Vietnam, your next job is making sure every segment supports the same trip story. A good reservation pack feels consistent even if someone checks it quickly or asks for a small date adjustment later.

Workflow (Build Order That Prevents Contradictions)

Here, we focus on building your flights in an order that prevents accidental conflicts.

1. Lock Your Vietnam Travel Window First
   Pick the entry date you can defend and the exit date that matches your trip length. Do this before you choose any internal flights.

2. Choose Your Entry City Based On Your Real First Stop
   If your first two days are in Ho Chi Minh City, land there. If you plan to start in Hanoi, land there. A mismatch looks like you picked airports for convenience, not travel.

3. Choose Your Exit City Based On Your Real Last Stop
   Your last city should match your departure airport. If you plan to end in Nha Trang but your final flight leaves from Ho Chi Minh City early the next morning, add enough time to reposition or change the plan.

4. Add Internal Flights Only After The Bookends Look Clean
   Now add internal legs, one at a time. For each leg, ask one question: Does this move explain itself?
   Examples that usually explain themselves:

• Ho Chi Minh City → Da Nang for a central coast stop

• Da Nang → Hanoi for a North finish

• Hanoi → Phu Quoc only when the trip length supports it

5. Space Legs Like A Real Trip, Not A Spreadsheet
   A safe spacing rule for most applicants is simple:

• Avoid stacking two flights on consecutive mornings

• Avoid landing late and flying out early the next day

• Leave at least one full day between major city changes when possible

6. Run A Consistency Scan Before You Save Anything
   Use this quick checklist:

• Passenger Details: same name format across all segments

• Dates: no overlaps, no impossible same-day sequences

• Airports: correct city-airport pairing for your stated stops

• Order: entry → movement → exit reads in one glance

• Local Times: watch midnight crossings that flip the date on paper

If you do this scan before you finalize, you prevent the most common “small” errors that create big questions. To enhance this process, consider using dummy tickets for initial drafts, allowing you to iterate without penalties.

Internal Flights Vs. “Leave It Implied”: When Fewer Legs Look More Believable

Not every Vietnam trip needs every movement written as a flight segment. Sometimes, fewer legs look stronger because there is less that can contradict your timing.

A practical approach is to decide what your itinerary must prove:

• If you mainly need to prove you will enter Vietnam and leave Vietnam, then a clean entry and clean exit can carry the file.

• If your plan depends on flying between regions, then add one internal flight that supports your route.

When it often helps to keep internal flights minimal:

• Short trips (5–7 days): one internal flight is usually enough if you are changing regions

• Trips with flexible middle days: too many segments lock you into a schedule you may not keep

• Applications where you expect date changes: fewer chained legs reduce update risk

When internal flights can be worth including:

• Your route includes a clear “must-fly” jump, like a tight time window between two far-apart cities

• You are entering one region and exiting another, and you want the movement to look intentional

A useful rule is that one proof leg beats three placeholder legs. If you add a flight, make sure it adds clarity, not complexity. This is where dummy tickets shine, providing verifiable proof without overcomplicating your submission.

The “Change-Resilience” Test: Will One Date Change Ruin Everything?

Vietnam plans a change. Visa appointments shift. Work leave moves. Your reservation pack should survive small edits without creating a chain reaction.

Here, we focus on building flights so a date change does not break the logic.

Run this test on your itinerary:

• If your entry date moves by 2–3 days, does every internal leg still make sense?

• If you remove one city, can the route still read naturally?

• If one flight time changes, do you still have realistic buffers?

To make your pack more resilient:

• Avoid domino chains: do not schedule internal flights so tightly that one change forces you to rebuild everything

• Use buffer days intentionally: keep at least one flexible day between key moves when you can

• Keep the middle lighter than the ends: the entry and exit matter most, so protect their clarity

• Do not lock every city to a fixed hour: ultra-precise timing across multiple days can look over-constructed

If you want a simple rebuild strategy, keep a “core route” and an “optional add-on”:

• Core route: entry city + one internal move + exit city

• Optional add-on: one extra city you can drop without damaging the story

If you are departing from Delhi and your first leg lands in Vietnam late evening, avoid adding an internal Vietnam flight early the next morning. Keep at least one full day in the arrival city, so your timeline reads calm and doable on paper.

If you need a verifiable flight reservation while you finalize your Vietnam dates, DummyFlights.com provides instantly verifiable reservations with a PNR and PDF, unlimited date changes, transparent pricing of $15 (~₹1,300), accepts credit cards, and is trusted worldwide for visa use.

The convenience of online booking for dummy tickets has revolutionized how travelers prepare for visa applications, particularly for complex itineraries like multi-city trips to Vietnam. With secure platforms, you can generate a professional PDF document that includes all necessary details, such as PNR codes and flight segments, ensuring it meets embassy standards. This process eliminates the need for physical visits or lengthy phone calls, allowing you to complete everything from your device in minutes. Emphasis on security means your personal data is protected with encryption, and instant delivery via email keeps your timeline on track. For Vietnam visas, where proof of onward travel is mandatory, these dummy tickets provide compliance without the risk of cancellation fees from real bookings. They support unlimited modifications, so if your plans shift, you can update seamlessly. To learn more about this efficient method, check out our guide on downloading a dummy ticket PDF for visa. This approach not only saves time and money but also reduces stress, keeping you engaged with the exciting aspects of your trip planning. Dive deeper into our resources to discover how easy it is to secure your documents and boost your application's success rate.

👉 Order your dummy ticket today

Multi-City Itinerary For Vietnam Visa: The Checklist That Prevents “This Was Made for a Visa” Vibes

A multi-city itinerary for a Vietnam visa can look solid on paper and still raise questions if the pattern feels copied, rushed, or inconsistent. Here, we focus on the signals that make a Vietnam embassy reviewer slow down and scrutinize your flight reservation sequence.

Visa Applicant Mistake Checklist (Multi-City Edition)

Use this checklist before you submit your itinerary, especially if you built it from Vietnam tour packages or selected Vietnam packages and then tried to “fit” flights around the cities.

• Your route looks like a brochure, not a trip.

  If your notes read like Vietnam tours marketing copy, such as dream trip, hassle-free travel, Vietnam holiday, or Vietnam vacation, it can feel assembled. Keep your flight sequence clean and let the route speak for itself.

• You packed too much into one travel window.

  A schedule that hits North Vietnam, Central Vietnam, and South Vietnam in a few days often looks unrealistic, even if you plan a city tour in each stop. The red flag is not ambition. The red flag is time math.

• Your flight chain “zigzags” without a reason.

  A north Vietnam stop, then a jump to the Mekong Delta, then back to the capital city, can look like you chose dots on a map. Keep movement directional.

• You mixed direct and connecting flights in a way that feels random.

  Direct and connecting flights can both be valid, but avoid unnecessary extra stops just to force a city into your plan.

• Your airport choices do not match your city story.

  If you start in Hanoi, make sure the arrival segment aligns with Noi Bai International Airport. A mismatch between city center plans and airport reality creates doubt fast.

• You used round-trip flights when your itinerary does not return to the same place.

  If your last stop is different, a round-trip structure can look like you picked the easiest template instead of the right route.

• You added domestic flights that create “impossible days.”

  Domestic flights should support the trip, not compress it. A flight that turns your day into nonstop transfers often reads like a placeholder.

• Your Vietnam timeline clashes with seasonal logic.

  If you claim the best time to visit is a certain period, but your flights show the opposite season for your chosen regions, it can look like you copied a generic plan without checking the time to visit Vietnam for your route.

• You over-specified money details inside the flight plan.

  Mentioning Vietnamese dong conversions or daily spend inside your flight sequence can distract from what the reviewer checks first: dates, movement, and exit proof.

Myth-Busting (Vietnam Itinerary Myths That Cause Bad Decisions)

Some multi-city problems start with a myth, not a mistake.

• Myth: “More stops look more credible.”

  A tight circuit that tries to include Ha Long Bay, Cat Ba Island, Hoi An, and Phu Quoc Island can look like a checklist run. Credibility comes from spacing and direction, not from quantity.

• Myth: “A luxury-looking plan helps.”

  Luxury Vietnam packages language does not help your visa file. A clean flight sequence does. Keep your plan grounded and consistent.

• Myth: “You must build your itinerary around attractions.”

  Attractions are fine, but flights need to explain movement. If your reason to fly is only “because it’s famous,” it can look thin.

• Myth: “If Vietnam feels complex, add more segments to prove planning.”

  If you worry about Vietnam being safe or Vietnam being expensive, do not solve that anxiety by adding more flights. Extra segments create extra points of inconsistency.

Here are patterns that often look believable versus patterns that often look manufactured, using common Vietnam package routes that people copy.

Looks believable when the flights match geography and pacing:

• Start in Hanoi, add a buffer day for Hoan Kiem Lake, then a short move that supports northern Vietnam plans like a long bay cruise across limestone islands with a boat ride, and return without forcing a same-day flight chain.

• Move into central Vietnam with a clear purpose, such as the former imperial capital and imperial city area, then continue logically to the south.

• End in Ho Chi Minh City with realistic time for Vietnamese history stops like the War Remnants Museum, Cu Chi tunnels, and Ben Thanh Market before you depart.

Looks risky when the pattern reads like stitched tourism highlights:

• A schedule that includes Hoi An ancient town, then an immediate jump to Phong Nha Ke Bang national park, then down to the Mekong delta the next morning, all while keeping every flight at similar hours.

• A Phu Quoc island add-on where your notes list Grand World, Sunset Town, Hon Thom cable car, and a cable car ride, but your flights leave no time to actually do any of it.

• A Ha Long Bay (Halong Bay) mention paired with a same-day departure out of a different city, which makes the plan look like a copy-paste itinerary rather than a travelable route.

When you draft examples like these, make sure the flight plan still works if one leg shifts. A Vietnam itinerary that survives small changes looks more real than one that only works in a perfect world.

If you are an applicant in Mumbai and your outbound segment shows Air India to reach Vietnam with a tight onward connection, avoid stacking a Vietnam internal hop on the same arrival day. Keep the first day stable, then build the rest of your domestic flights around realistic recovery time. Dummy tickets can be particularly useful here for testing connections.

“What If My Plan Changes?” Risk Control For Vietnam Itineraries

Some Vietnam applications get stronger with a multi-city structure, but only when you choose the right shape and keep it stable under change. Here, we focus on the uncommon situations that create avoidable risk, plus the practical moves that keep your flight reservation pack coherent if your dates or cities shift.

Open-Jaw + Internal Hop: The Safest “Multi-City Feel” For Many Applicants

If you want a plan that looks natural to a Vietnam embassy reviewer, open-jaw often does the job with fewer moving parts. You arrive in one city, depart from another, and include only one internal flight when it truly supports your route.

This structure works well when your trip is directional, like moving through Southeast Asia into Vietnam and then traveling north-to-south or south-to-north.

Open-jaw can fit a real travel story without forcing extra segments:

• Arrive in the capital city, travel through the country, and depart from the south

• Arrive in the south, travel upward, and depart from the north

• Arrive at one hub and depart from another after a clear internal move

Add one internal hop only when it adds clarity. For example, if your plan includes central Vietnam and you want a clean pivot between regions, one internal flight can make the timeline easier to understand.

Avoid building an open-jaw plan that looks like a tour slogan. Your flights should show movement, not sell a Vietnam holiday. Dummy tickets facilitate this by providing editable proofs.

Third-Country Transits And Long Layovers: When They Raise Questions

Transits are normal. What creates doubt is when your routing looks like you chose complexity for paperwork rather than travel.

Long layovers can trigger extra scrutiny when:

• The layover pushes your arrival date forward, and your itinerary still claims you start activities that same day

• Your route adds a detour that makes no sense for reaching Vietnam from your departure region

• Your timings imply you will clear immigration, move across terminals, and still catch an onward segment with no buffer

If your itinerary includes a long layover, keep your stated plan consistent with that reality. Do not schedule a city center plan immediately after landing if the arrival time is late.

A practical safeguard is to keep your first day light in the narrative. It also makes later changes easier if your flight time shifts.

If you are applying for an e visa, consistency matters even more because your entry date and point of entry must match what you submit. A route that relies on fragile connections can force last-minute edits.

Short Trips, Many Cities: The “Overpacked Weekend” Problem

A short trip can still be credible, but a packed flight chain often looks like you tried to fit every highlight into a tiny window. That is where a multi-city itinerary for a Vietnam visa starts to feel manufactured.

Overpacking is easy when your plan includes:

• a quick add-on for an overnight cruise

• a stop for a UNESCO World Heritage Site

• a fast swing through central Vietnam for the Golden Bridge

• a beach detour for Vietnam beaches

None of these places is the problem. The problem is when your flights leave no real time to do them.

Use this realism check before you lock your segments:

• If you fly into a city late, do not fly out early the next morning.

• If you add a signature activity day, protect it with a buffer day.

• If your plan includes long travel distances, reduce the number of flight legs.

If your goal is a romantic getaway, it is usually smarter to make fewer city changes. A calm route reads more believable than a rushed circuit, and it survives date changes better. Expand by noting that dummy tickets allow testing short-trip scenarios without commitment.

Last-Minute Changes And Rebooking: How To Avoid Inconsistency Shock

Plans change after you submit. What matters is how your updated flight itinerary looks if someone compares it to what you originally provided.

Here, we focus on preventing the most damaging kind of mismatch: a revised segment that breaks your trip story.

When your dates change, update using this order:

1. Update the entry date and entry city first

   These are the anchors. If your entry shifts, the rest must align behind it.

2. Update your exit flight next

   Your departure should still match your last planned city and your total trip length.

3. Rebuild internal flights last

   Internal legs are the most likely to shift. Keep them flexible.

Avoid these common rebooking traps:

• You change one segment but leave the others untouched, creating impossible gaps.

• Your updated plan shows a new internal flight, but your narrative still references the visit to Vietnam activities in a different region on the same day.

• Your new departure time makes your last-day plan unrealistic, but the itinerary still reads like a fixed schedule.

If you want a simple stability rule, keep your experiences separate from your flights. Your flights should show movement. Your activity plan can mention local street food, local markets, and local customs without forcing exact hour-by-hour commitments that become brittle.

One more practical money-related note: if you worry that Vietnam's expensive changes will affect your timing, do not solve it by adding more city hops. Extra legs create more opportunities for inconsistency. Dummy tickets mitigate this by offering low-cost, changeable options.

Visit HaLong Bay, Hoi An, And Phu Quoc With An Itinerary That Looks Travelable, Not Overbuilt

For a multi-city itinerary for Vietnam visa, the Vietnam embassy wants flights that read clean from entry to exit and still make sense if dates shift. Keep your route realistic, keep your segments consistent, and make sure your Vietnam e details match what you submit so your plan supports the story you are telling.

Once your sequence feels stable, you can apply, knowing you did not force cities just to “look planned,” and you can focus on what you actually want to visit in Vietnam, because Vietnam is worth visiting, and it should be your trip goal, not an itinerary risk. If indian tourists or indian travellers ask for one last check, we review the timing and routing before you submit.

As you finalize your Vietnam visa application, remember that embassy-approved documentation is essential for demonstrating your travel intentions without ambiguity. Dummy tickets serve as reliable proof of onward travel, providing verifiable details that align with your multi-city itinerary while avoiding the pitfalls of actual bookings. These tools ensure your entry and exit points are clear, with internal hops that reflect a logical progression through Vietnam's regions. By choosing a service that offers instant PDFs with PNR verification, you reinforce the authenticity of your plans, helping reviewers see a genuine trip rather than a contrived one. Final tips include double-checking dates for coherence, incorporating buffer time for connections, and keeping your narrative focused on realistic activities. For a deeper understanding, explore our article on what is a dummy ticket. This preparation not only minimizes risks but also streamlines the process, allowing you to focus on the excitement of your journey. Take the next step by securing your dummy ticket today to ensure a smooth and successful visa approval.

Frequently Asked Questions About Dummy Ticket for Vietnam Visa

To expand on the topic and provide more value, here are some common questions about using dummy tickets for Vietnam visa applications.

• What is a dummy ticket and how does it help with Vietnam visa?
  A dummy ticket is a verifiable flight reservation used as proof of travel for visa applications without purchasing actual tickets. It helps by providing flexible, low-cost documentation that meets embassy requirements.

• Is a dummy ticket legal for Vietnam visa submissions?
  Yes, as long as it's verifiable and matches your itinerary, it's accepted as proof of onward travel. Always check current guidelines.

• How many changes can I make to a dummy ticket?
  Most services offer unlimited changes, allowing you to adjust dates or routes as needed without extra fees.

• Can I use a dummy ticket for multi-city itineraries?
  Absolutely, it's ideal for complex routes as it lets you build and test sequences without financial risk.

• What if my visa is rejected—do I lose money on the dummy ticket?
  No, dummy tickets are inexpensive and don't involve real bookings, so your loss is minimal.

Why Travelers Trust DummyFlights.com

DummyFlights.com has been helping travelers since 2019 with reliable dummy ticket services tailored for visa applications.

• Over 50,000 visa applicants supported with verifiable reservations.

• 24/7 customer support for any queries or changes.

• Secure online payment and instant PDF delivery for convenience.

• DummyFlights.com specializes in dummy ticket reservations only, ensuring niche expertise and high-quality service.

• As a real registered business with a dedicated support team, DummyFlights.com provides no fake or automated tickets, building trust through transparency.
   

What Travelers Are Saying

★★★★★

“Dummy ticket worked perfectly for my Vietnam multi-city visa—easy changes!”

Raj • DEL → HAN

★★★★★

“Instant verification at the embassy, no hassles with my itinerary.”

Sophie • SYD → SGN

★★★★★

“Unlimited updates saved my application when dates changed.”

Miguel • MAD → DAD