Onward vs Return Ticket Requirements: What Airlines and Immigration Actually Check (2026)

The check-in agent scans your one-way booking and asks for proof that you will leave. At the border, an officer compares your dates to your permitted stay and decides if your plan sounds temporary. In 2026, those checks are faster, and the wrong ticket type can mean delays or denied boarding.

We will help you choose between an onward ticket and a return ticket based on who is asking and how your route works. You will set exit dates that stay inside your allowed window, avoid transit and routing traps, and keep your documents consistent from visa file to departure day.
 

onward ticket vs return ticket 2026 is a crucial distinction for today’s travelers—immigration rules vary widely, and presenting the wrong type of ticket can lead to denied boarding or heavy questioning on arrival. 🌍 Understanding which one immigration prefers helps you avoid costly mistakes and ensures smooth entry into your destination country.

Choose a professional, PNR-verified onward ticket vs return ticket 2026 compliant reservation to satisfy airline checks and immigration policies without overspending on non-refundable tickets. Pro Tip: Most visa-free or digital nomad travelers are safer with an onward ticket, while visa-required itineraries often benefit from a documented return plan. 👉 Order your onward/return ticket now and travel confidently with zero risk.

Last updated: February 2026 — Based on current airline boarding rules, IATA compliance requirements, and immigration patterns across 80+ countries.

Planning your visa application effectively starts with credible proof of your travel intentions. A practical first step many successful applicants take is using a dummy airline ticket generator with PNR to create temporary flight itineraries. These tools let you generate realistic reservations tailored to your exact trip dates and route, serving as excellent visa application proof without any financial risk or commitment to actual travel bookings. This risk-free PDF approach ensures you have verifiable details like flight numbers, times, and passenger records that align perfectly with your intended stay. It simplifies early-stage visa planning by removing the stress of expensive refundable tickets while still meeting embassy expectations for demonstrating onward or return travel. The process is quick, secure, and designed specifically for documentation purposes, allowing you to focus on building a strong overall application. Whether applying for Schengen, UK, or other popular destinations, having this flexible proof ready early boosts your confidence. Explore how these generators can streamline your preparations and help present a polished, consistent story to decision-makers.

We will also cover uncommon situations, fixes when you booked the wrong option, and the details that make your proof easy to verify every time. If check-in wants proof you’ll exit before your stay limit, use a dummy ticket booking that matches your onward or return date.

The Real Question Isn’t “Which Ticket?”—It’s “Who’s Asking for It?”

On a Dubai to London itinerary, a return flight can calm one person and irritate the next. You get fewer surprises when you build your proof for the strictest checkpoint on your route.

Three Gatekeepers, Three Different Definitions of “Good Enough”

At airline check-in, “good enough” means “low risk for the airline.” On a flight from Istanbul to Barcelona, staff often treat Schengen rules as non-negotiable because carriers can face penalties if you are refused entry. A clear exit within your Schengen short-stay window ends the debate.

At immigration, “good enough” means “you look compliant.” A Canada border officer assessing a visitor entry can accept a one-way ticket into Toronto if you show an onward flight to the United States within your authorized period and your plan is believable.

At visa processing, “good enough” means “your documents agree.” A UK Standard Visitor file with a round-trip that matches your stated leave dates reads clean. If your itinerary shows a return after the dates you wrote on the form, you have created an avoidable inconsistency.

These checks do not run on one script. On a Doha to Bangkok route under Thailand’s visa exemption, the airline may demand proof of onward travel at check-in, while Thai immigration focuses on whether your stay length fits the exemption period.

The Hidden Rule: They Want an Exit That Matches Your Permission Window

Your ticket is judged against the time you are allowed to stay. If you enter Japan as a temporary visitor with a 90-day permission, an exit on day 80 looks consistent, while a return on day 120 creates an obvious mismatch.

This is why “return ticket” is not automatically safer. If you land in Paris on a Schengen visa allowing 30 days, a return from Paris on day 27 is clean, but a return from Berlin on day 33 forces an explanation about compliance and routing.

Build a buffer inside the limit. For a short Singapore visa-free stay, an exit a few days before the maximum can reduce counter questions on a one-way ticket, especially when the airline is the strict gatekeeper.

Transit rules can quietly break an otherwise perfect plan. An onward flight from Spain to Morocco that transits the UK can fail as proof if you cannot meet the UK airside transit requirements for your passport.

Onward Vs Return In 90 Seconds

Start with your entry type. If you are using ESTA to enter the United States for tourism, airlines commonly want clear proof that you will leave the U.S., and a round-trip often resolves the check faster. If you are entering Germany on a long-stay student visa, a one-way is normal, and forcing a return can look out of place.

Then check whether your end date is fixed. A business trip to Dubai for a three-day event fits a return dated right after the conference. A multi-country plan like Kuala Lumpur to overland Thailand to a flight out of Bangkok fits an onward ticket from Thailand better than a random return to your origin.

Next, validate feasibility. If you fly into New Zealand on a visitor entry, an onward or return is often expected, but it must be a route that operates and a destination you can legally enter, not an onward to China without entry permission.

Finally, pick the strictest checkpoint you will meet. If you are transiting Frankfurt before continuing onward, the airline may still apply Schengen logic at your departure airport, so you plan the ticket to satisfy that first gatekeeper.

The 2026 Verification Reality Check: What Gets Checked Quickly

Verification is quicker now, so proof fails faster. A gate agent at Heathrow can compare your exit date to your visa conditions and spot conflicts before boarding, especially on routes into the Schengen Area or the United States.

Retrievability matters. If you present a reservation for Rome to Tunis, staff may try to pull the PNR or cross-check the passenger name, date, and flight number. Small differences, like missing middle names, can slow you down.

System prompts also drive questions. A one-way ticket to Manila under a tourist entry can trigger an onward-travel check at the airline desk, even if Philippine immigration might not ask you at that moment.

Online check-in can also fail silently. On a one-way flight to Denpasar under Indonesia’s visa on arrival, the airline app may block boarding pass issuance until you upload onward proof. If you fix it at the airport, you are negotiating in a queue, not from your couch, with the staff.

Schedule changes create preventable mismatches. If your Madrid to São Paulo return shifts after you submitted a consulate itinerary, you can end up with one version in your visa file and another on your phone at check-in.

Immigration Prefers Is Often Shorthand For Immigration Prefers Consistency

When someone says “Australia prefers a return ticket,” they usually mean a visitor entry where your stay is a two-week holiday and your round-trip matches that two-week plan. The ticket works because it supports the narrative that the officer expects for that visa category.

Consistency must hold across documents. If your Schengen application says 10 days in Italy but your flight plan shows a return from Amsterdam after 25 days, you created a conflict that invites scrutiny. In that same case, onward from Milan to Athens on day 9 can look more coherent if your plan is to exit Schengen within your stated window.

Consistency must also hold in conversation. If you enter the UAE on a tourist entry and your return departs from Sharjah, you should be able to explain that route in one clear sentence, because confusing logistics lead to extra questioning even with a valid visa.

Once you see that the real decision is “who needs to be convinced,” we can move to the cases where an onward ticket is the cleanest solution for your trip.

When an Onward Ticket Is the Cleanest Solution

An onward ticket becomes your best tool when your trip is built around moving on, not looping back. It also helps when your return date is real but not final yet, and the airline desk still needs a concrete exit.

The Classic Fit: You’re Entering Country A but Leaving for Country B

If you fly into Lisbon on a Schengen short-stay visa but plan to continue to Morocco, an onward flight out of the Schengen Area often matches the story better than a round-trip back to your origin that you will not use. The onward ticket explains why your entry city and your eventual “end point” are different.

If you land in Seoul on South Korea’s short-stay entry and your plan is Seoul to Hanoi, the onward leg aligns with the pattern immigration expects from regional travelers. The border conversation becomes simple because the exit is part of the itinerary, not an afterthought.

If you arrive in Mexico City on a visitor entry and your real plan is to continue to Guatemala City, an onward flight can prevent check-in friction on the first flight, especially when the airline sees a one-way ticket into Mexico. In that situation, the onward is not about proving you will return home soon. It is about proving you will not stay indefinitely in the first country you enter.

If your visa file is for a multi-country itinerary, an onward ticket can also reduce confusion during processing. A Schengen application that lists Spain and Portugal but shows a final flight out of Porto to Tunis often reads more logically than a return that departs from a city you never mentioned.

You’re Genuinely Undecided on the Return Date—Onward Proves You Won’t Overstay

On a 30-day visitor permission in Singapore, you can be undecided on your homebound date while still being decisive about leaving Singapore within the allowed stay. An onward flight to Kuala Lumpur can demonstrate compliance without forcing you to pretend your final return date is fixed.

If you enter Japan for a short stay and you are choosing between two later return weeks, an onward ticket from Tokyo to Taipei inside your likely stay window can satisfy the immediate “exit plan” question. That approach works best when your onward destination is one you can realistically enter, and you can explain why it is your next stop.

If you are entering South Africa for tourism with plans to continue through Namibia, an onward flight to Windhoek can be easier to defend than a return dated far out while you are still planning the second half of the trip. In that context, the onward ticket supports a regional route that border officers often.

If your itinerary includes multiple short stays, an onward ticket can also prevent you from locking a return date that later conflicts with the visa validity dates you receive. For example, a traveler waiting on final dates for a Schengen visa can still show a credible “exit Schengen” flight that sits safely inside a conservative stay length.

How to Pick an Onward Date That Looks Intentional, Not Random

Pick an onward date that matches a reason someone would actually move on. If you are entering Rome for tourism and plan to continue to Athens, an onward flight about 7 to 14 days after arrival often matches typical city-to-city travel pacing better than “next day onward” unless you are clearly transiting.

Match the onward date to a named commitment when your trip includes one. If you are entering Dubai for an expo week and then heading to Muscat, set the onward date right after the event, because the timing tells a coherent story at check-in and at immigration.

Avoid dates that look like you picked them to “just satisfy a rule.” If you arrive in Bangkok and your onward flight is exactly one day before the maximum stay with no explanation, some airline desks will still accept it, but it can invite questions about why your plan is so close to the limit.

Choose flight times that look workable. If you show an onward flight that departs at 5:00 a.m. from a different airport across a city you have not planned for, you create an easy “feasibility” objection at check-in. A midday departure from the same airport can remove that friction.

The Buffer Rule: Choose an Exit Date That’s Comfortably Inside Your Permitted Stay

Use a buffer so your ticket cannot accidentally drift outside your allowed stay after changes. If you enter the Schengen Area with an intended 12-day trip, setting the onward flight on day 10 leaves room if your inbound flight is delayed or your entry stamp is interpreted strictly.

A buffer is especially helpful on routes where airlines enforce onward proof aggressively. If you fly into Bali under a visa-on-arrival and the airline wants to see you leaving Indonesia, an exit flight that is clearly inside the stay window reduces debate when staff check rules quickly.

The buffer rule also protects you from schedule changes and missed connections. If your onward is on the last legal day and your inbound gets pushed back, your exit can suddenly look misaligned even if your plan is honest.

Keep the buffer proportional to your permitted stay. On a 14-day permission, leaving 2 or 3 days early can look safer than leaving with only hours left. On a 90-day permission, leaving one week early often looks normal and does not feel like an artificial cutoff.

When a Return Ticket Can Look Suspiciously “Too Neat”

A return ticket can raise eyebrows when it does not match how your trip is described. If your plan is “backpacking across the Balkans,” but you show a perfectly symmetrical round-trip in and out of the same airport with no internal movement, an officer may ask why the return is so fixed while the plan is so vague.

A return can also look engineered when the dates are oddly specific without a reason. A return on day 29 of a 30-day permission can be fine, but if you cannot explain why you are leaving on that exact day, the request can trigger follow-up questions that an onward ticket to the next country would avoid.

Returns can create routing problems you do not notice. If your round-trip forces a transit through a country where you need a transit visa, the return “proof” becomes a risk at check-in. In that scenario, an onward flight that avoids a problematic transit can be the safer option even when you plan to return home later.

Some visa files also become harder to read with a return that contradicts your stated route. If your cover letter says you will exit from Nice but your return departs Paris, a case officer may ask for clarification. An onward flight out of your last stated city can keep the file consistent.

Building an Onward Plan That Reads Like a Real Traveler’s Decision

Step 1: Anchor your onward to the entry conditions you are using.
If you are entering the Schengen Area on a short-stay visa, make sure your journey clearly leaves the Schengen Area. If you are entering on a visa waiver with a strict stay limit, make the onward date comfortably inside that limit.

Step 2: Choose a destination you can plausibly enter.
If you pick an onward flight to a country that requires a visa you do not have, your proof can collapse at the first serious check. If you pick an onward flight to a nearby country with straightforward entry for your passport, the plan looks credible.

Step 3: Eliminate transit traps before you book the onward.
If your onward requires an airport change in a transit country with tight rules, you risk problems even if the onward itself is valid. A direct onward or a transit through an airport where your connection is clean usually reduces check-in escalation.

Step 4: Match the onward routing to your travel style.
If you are traveling with checked baggage, an onward flight that involves multiple low-cost carrier segments can look unrealistic for a short transfer. A single segment onward often reads more believable for luggage-heavy itineraries.

Step 5: Keep passenger details exact and consistent across documents.
If your passport includes a middle name, your onward booking should reflect the same name format you use on your inbound. If your visa file shows one spelling and your onward shows another, you create a verification headache.

Step 6: Carry proof in a format that survives a quick verification attempt.
Airline desks often respond best to a clean PDF itinerary that shows your name, the flight number, the date, and the route. If your proof is scattered across apps and emails, you lose time when staff ask for something specific.

Scenario: One-Way Arrival + Flexible Trip Length

You fly from São Paulo to Madrid on a one-way ticket because you plan to spend time in Spain and Portugal, then continue to Istanbul before deciding on your final return. At check-in, the airline’s concern is whether you will exit the Schengen Area, not whether you have finalized your homebound date.

We solve that with an onward flight that leaves Schengen from the last place you say you will be. If your itinerary says you end in Lisbon, an onward Lisbon to Istanbul inside your planned stay window supports the exact route you described.

At immigration, keep your explanation aligned with the onward journey. You say you are visiting Spain and Portugal, then flying to Turkey on a specific date, and you have the flight details ready. You avoid extra storytelling about what happens after Turkey because it is not needed to prove compliance with your current entry.

If you are asked why you do not have a return home yet, you tie it to the trip structure. You have a confirmed exit from the country you are entering, and your final return depends on the timing of your next destination. That is a normal travel pattern when the onward is clear and feasible, and it sets up the next decision point where a return ticket can be the safer bet.

As your travel plans take shape, the ease of obtaining professional documentation online stands out as a major convenience. Securing a dummy ticket PDF for visa through reputable online services provides instant access to secure, embassy-compliant reservations that you can download immediately. These bookings come with full PNR details and are formatted to satisfy both airline check-in systems and immigration requirements seamlessly. The process emphasizes security and reliability, ensuring your personal data is protected while delivering a document that looks and functions like a standard itinerary. This is especially valuable for multi-leg journeys where flexibility is key, as you avoid locking into costly fares prematurely. Many travelers appreciate the compliance focus that aligns directly with current 2026 border policies. If you're coordinating complex itineraries, this approach keeps everything organized and presentation-ready. Consider integrating such tools into your preparation to maintain momentum and ensure all your proof of travel is handled professionally from start to finish.

When a Return Ticket Is the Safer Bet

A return ticket works best when your trip has a clear endpoint that matches what border officers and airline systems expect for that entry type. It also helps when your routing options are limited, and staff want a simple, closed loop.

Short-Stay Tourism Where Your “End Date” Is Part of the Story

On a UK Standard Visitor trip for a family wedding in Manchester, a round-trip with a return two days after the event supports a tight, believable timeline that a caseworker can scan quickly.

On a Schengen short-stay itinerary built around a pre-booked tour in Italy, a return dated right after the tour ends makes your trip length feel intentional when a consulate compares your form dates to your flights.

On a UAE tourist entry for a trade show in Dubai, a return flight that aligns with the exhibition dates reduces follow-up questions about why you are staying longer than the event.

On a short-stay visit where you already have approved leave from work, a return that matches the leave window reads cleaner than an onward that suggests open-ended movement.

Return tickets shine when your story is “arrive, do the thing, leave.” If your plan is “two cities in seven nights” in Spain, a return within that week signals you are not trying to stretch the rules.

Visa Waivers and “Simple Entries” That Still Trigger Onward/Return Checks

On the U.S. Visa Waiver Program with ESTA, airlines often want a visible exit plan before they issue a boarding pass, and a round-trip is frequently the fastest proof because it shows both entry and exit in one record.

On Canada eTA travel, where you land in Vancouver for a short visit, a return can reduce desk negotiation because airline staff can see your departure date without hunting for a separate onward booking.

On Japan's visa-free entry for tourism, a return ticket can prevent a long conversation at check-in when your one-way ticket looks like relocation, especially on routes with high one-way misuse patterns.

In New Zealand, NZeTA travel into Auckland, carriers routinely ask for proof that you will depart, and a round-trip is often the simplest way to satisfy that requirement without explaining a multi-stop plan.

On Singapore's visa-free entry, some airlines still ask for onward proof on one-way tickets even when your stay is short, and a return ticket avoids last-minute document uploading in the airline app.

If your trip is “simple entry, simple exit,” we usually treat the airline as the most demanding checkpoint and build the return ticket to remove reasons for escalation.

Islands, Remote Regions, and Places Where Exit Options Are Limited

On travel to the Maldives with a short-stay permission, a return is often the most credible exit plan because there are limited onward routes that make sense for the average itinerary.

On a trip to Mauritius for a resort stay, a return flight supports the typical travel pattern and avoids questions about why you would onward to a place you cannot easily reach from the island.

On entry to Fiji for tourism, check-in staff often look for a confirmed departure because missing onward proof can strand you in a destination with fewer same-day alternatives.

On travel to Iceland via Keflavik within a Schengen trip, a return helps if your itinerary is island-based, because “we will fly back out” matches the geography better than “we will find something later.”

On French Polynesian (Papeete) itineraries, a return is practical proof because onward options can be expensive and infrequent, and airline staff know that reality.

Remote destinations create a simple credibility test. If your plan is a beach week in the Seychelles, a return fits the limited-exit logic that airline counters apply when they assess risk.

Return Ticket Timing Pitfalls

A return after your allowed stay is the fastest way to trigger questions. On a Schengen visa with 15 days granted, a return on day 18 can cause check-in refusal even if your hotel plan says you will leave earlier.

A return that conflicts with your visa validity dates causes the same problem. On a UK visitor visa valid from March 10, a return dated March 5 signals the itinerary was not checked, and that weakens credibility during entry questioning.

A return that requires a transit you cannot take can collapse at the airport. On a South African visit where your return connects through a country that requires an airside transit visa for your passport, airline staff may block you even though the final destination is home.

A return from a different country than the one you entered can confuse the “where are you leaving from” logic if you cannot show how you will get there. On a U.S. B1/B2 trip into Los Angeles, a return from New York is fine only if your plan clearly includes domestic travel that matches your time and funds.

A return on a route that is known for missed connections can raise practical doubts. On a Manila itinerary with a 45-minute return connection in a busy hub, the flight may be real, but the plan may look fragile to a risk-focused check-in agent.

A return booked for a time you cannot realistically reach the airport can also create friction. On a Bangkok stay where your return departs at 6:00 a.m. from an airport far from your stated accommodation area, staff can treat the plan as sloppy.

Here is a quick return-ticket audit that stays grounded in real checkpoints:

Does the return date sit inside the permitted stay for Japan's 90-day visa-free entry?
Does the return routing avoid a transit visa trap for a Schengen departure?
Does the return airport match your declared itinerary city for a UK Standard Visitor file?
Does the return name format match your passport for U.S. ESTA check-in systems?

How To Choose A Return Itinerary That Doesn’t Accidentally Create Red Flags

Choose a return that matches how border officers expect you to travel on that entry type. On a UK Standard Visitor trip, a direct return to your home region often reads simpler than a return that detours through several countries without a clear reason.

Keep the routing consistent with your purpose. On a business visitor entry to Singapore for meetings, a return that leaves right after the meeting window supports the “short professional visit” pattern that officers see daily.

Avoid returns that look like disguised long stays. On Japan visa-free travel, a return that departs near day 90 can be fine, but it works best when the rest of your plan looks financially and logistically consistent with a long holiday.

Pick a return that does not create “unexplained movement.” On a Schengen itinerary focused on France, a return from Prague can look odd unless your plan clearly includes Central Europe and you can explain why the exit point changed.

Aim for a clean, verifiable record that staff can interpret quickly at check-in. On U.S. ESTA routes, airline systems often display outbound segments clearly when they are part of the same reservation, which reduces back-and-forth at the counter.

Use a simple structure when scrutiny is likely. On routes into Canada where a one-way can trigger extra questions, a straightforward round-trip reduces the chance you get pulled into a rule interpretation debate.

If you have a legitimate open-jaw trip, make it readable. On a Spain to Portugal itinerary, an open-jaw like “arrive Madrid, depart Lisbon” can work as a return-style proof when you can explain the overland segment and your dates still fit your permission window.

A good return ticket is not about being perfect. It is about being easy to verify and easy to understand for the next person who has 30 seconds to decide if you board, which leads directly into how border officers interpret the story your ticket tells.

How Border Officers Interpret Your Ticket: The Story It Tells in 15 Seconds

At the border, your ticket is not “proof.” It is a fast shortcut officers use to decide whether your entry fits the rules you are asking for.

The Narrative Test: Does Your Routing Match Your Purpose?

Border officers start with a simple question: Does your route look like the trip you claim you are taking?

If you arrive in Sydney on an ETA (subclass 601) and say “two-week holiday,” a round-trip Sydney to your home country usually matches that narrative. If your exit is instead Sydney to Kuala Lumpur, officers can still accept it, but they may ask why you are leaving Australia for a third country if your trip is purely tourism.

If you enter Ireland in Dublin as a visitor to see family, a ticket that exits from Dublin after a reasonable stay supports the “single-base visit” story. If your departure is from Paris, you have created a second story you now must explain: how you will move from Ireland to France, and why.

Officers also look for “purpose drift.” On a Schengen short-stay visa issued for Belgium, arriving in Brussels and departing from Brussels looks consistent. Arriving in Brussels and departing from Stockholm can still be valid, but it often triggers questions about whether your real itinerary matches what you submitted.

We can make this test easy to pass by tying the exit flight to a clear next step. A visitor entry to Argentina for tourism reads clean when your onward is Buenos Aires to Santiago for a continuing trip in South America, and your dates stay within the visitor period you are granted.

The Timeline Test: Date Spacing That Looks Human vs Manufactured

After routing, officers check the calendar. They compare your arrival date, your claimed length of stay, and your exit date.

If you land in Auckland on a short-stay entry and your ticket shows an exit after the typical visitor window, that mismatch stands out immediately. Even when your visa is valid, an exit date that appears to exceed the stay you are requesting can trigger deeper questioning.

Timing can also look suspicious in the other direction. If you enter Copenhagen on a Schengen visa and your onward flight leaves the next morning, the officer may ask whether you are actually entering Denmark or simply using it as a transit point. That is not “bad,” but it changes the questions you will face.

Watch for dates that do not match how people travel for the purpose stated. On a Saudi Arabia tourist eVisa, a seven-day entry with a return in exactly seven days looks normal. A return in 48 hours with no stated reason can look like a visa-run style pattern, and officers may ask what you are really doing.

We can also avoid “calendar conflicts” that happen when you mix trip planning with visa processing. If you told the Italian consulate you will travel from June 10 to June 22, but your exit flight is June 28, you have created a timeline that can look careless. Even if you can explain it later, border officers often treat paperwork mismatches as a risk signal.

A practical rule that works across Australia ETA, UK Standard Visitor, and Schengen short stays is simple: your exit date should match your stated trip length, and it should not brush right up against the maximum stay unless you have a clear reason.

The “Feasibility Test”: Can You Actually Take the Flight You’re Showing?

Officers also test whether the exit you show is realistic for your passport and your route.

A common failure is an onward ticket to a country you cannot legally enter. If you present an onward flight from Vienna to Cairo, but you cannot meet Egypt’s entry requirements for your passport, the onward flight is still a flight, but it is not a believable plan. Immigration in Austria may not be judging Egypt’s visa rules in detail, but the moment your onward journey looks impossible, your credibility drops.

Transit feasibility matters too. If you return from Santiago routes through a hub that requires a transit visa for your passport, airline staff may block you before immigration ever sees the ticket. Border officers know this happens. If they see a connection that looks implausible, they may ask how you plan to complete it.

Feasibility also includes basic travel logic. If you tell Norwegian border control you will stay in Oslo for five days, but your return departs from Helsinki with no time buffer, you have to explain the overland transfer and why that exit point makes sense.

We can make the feasibility obvious by keeping the exit simple. A direct or common-route departure from the same country you entered, or a nearby onward flight that aligns with your stated itinerary, reduces the number of “how will you get there” questions you invite at the desk.

What Officers Ask When They Don’t Like What They See

When officers doubt the ticket story, they usually probe in predictable directions. The questions differ by country, but the pattern is consistent.

In the United States, on B1/B2, you may hear: “How long are you staying?” and “Where will you go after this?” If your ticket shows a one-way into Miami with an onward to Panama City, the officer may ask why Panama is next and what you will do there. You do not need a long explanation. You need a direct one that matches your booking and your declared plan.

In Schengen, entry through Amsterdam, officers often ask for clarity on your route if your departure is from a different Schengen country. If your exit is Warsaw, be ready to state your internal travel plan in two sentences and keep the dates aligned with the flight.

In Australia, on an ETA, officers may ask about the return date and whether you will work. If your return is far out, you should be ready to explain how you will support yourself for that period and why your itinerary length makes sense for tourism or visiting family.

We can prepare you with a quick “answer structure” that fits these checkpoints:

State your exit flight route and date first, using the same city names on the itinerary.
State your purpose in one line that fits the visa type, such as tourism, business meetings, or visiting relatives.
Stop there unless the officer asks for more, because extra details can create new contradictions.

Departing From Delhi on a One-Way, Connecting Through the Gulf

You depart from Delhi on a one-way ticket to Athens, connecting through a Gulf hub, and you plan to continue through Greece before flying onward to Tbilisi. The airline check-in conversation is one layer, but the border decision in Greece is another.

At the Greek Schengen entry, the officer will often look for a coherent “Schengen stay” story first. If your onward flight is Athens to Tbilisi inside your intended Schengen stay, that supports a clean narrative: enter Schengen, travel in Greece, then exit Schengen.

The risk appears when the onward is technically valid but practically unclear. If your onward flight departs from Thessaloniki while you arrive in Athens, and you cannot explain how you will get there, the officer may treat the flight as paperwork rather than a plan.

We can make this scenario strong by keeping the onward aligned with the city you will plausibly be in at exit, and by keeping the timing consistent with how people actually travel inside Greece on a short stay visa.

Once you understand how immigration reads your ticket in seconds, the next challenge is making sure the airline counter does not block you before you ever reach that border desk.

The Airline Check-In Problem: How to Avoid “Denied Boarding” With the Right Proof

Airlines make the boarding decision first, and they make it fast. If their system says you might not meet entry or onward rules, your trip can stall at the counter before immigration ever sees your passport.

Why Airlines Can Be Stricter Than Immigration

Airlines are judged on compliance, not on your intent. A border officer in Thailand might ask two questions and let you in, but a check-in agent flying you to Bangkok may still require onward proof because the carrier carries the risk if you are refused entry.

That difference matters on routes with strong “proof of exit” enforcement at departure. On a one-way trip to the Philippines under visa-free entry, some airlines will not issue a boarding pass unless they see an onward flight inside the allowed stay window, even if you are confident you can explain your plan on arrival.

Transit can make airline checks harsher than you expect. A traveler flying from Nairobi to Paris via Istanbul can be blocked if the transit leg triggers a document requirement that the airline believes you do not meet, even when the final destination rules look fine.

Airlines also react to patterns, not your personal story. A one-way ticket into Toronto with an eTA can trigger a “proof of departure” check because carriers see it as a higher-risk shape of itinerary than a round-trip, even if you have strong ties and clear plans.

So the goal is not “convince the airline you are honest.” The goal is “remove the airline’s uncertainty in the few fields their system checks.”

Pre-Flight Verification You Do Before Leaving Home

Step 1: Write down the exact entry basis you will use.
If you are entering Japan visa-free, your allowed stay and conditions are not the same as those of a temporary visitor visa. If you are entering the UK on a Standard Visitor visa, your visa validity is not the same as your permitted stay at the border. You need the correct basis because airline agents check the basis, not your assumptions.

Step 2: Confirm your “must-exit-by” date for the first country you land in.
If you fly into Amsterdam under the Schengen short stay and plan to continue to Croatia, the check-in desk is focused on whether your exit from the Schengen Area is within your permitted window, not on whether Croatia is your dream stop.

Step 3: Decide what proof you will show at the airport.
If you are traveling on a one-way ticket to Kuala Lumpur and you know your airline typically asks for onward proof, plan to show a verifiable onward booking that leaves Malaysia within the allowed stay. If you are traveling to Sydney on an ETA with a fixed vacation end date, plan a round-trip that matches that end date.

Step 4: Validate transit permissions for every connection on your exact route.
A return ticket that transits a country with strict airside transit rules can fail as proof, even if the return date is perfect. Check the transit country for your passport, and do not assume “airside” means “no rules.”

Step 5: Make your proof easy to retrieve and easy to scan.
If a check-in agent asks for onward travel on your one-way into Manila, you want a single PDF that shows your name, route, flight number, and date. You do not want to dig through five screenshots with different cropping and different timestamps.

Step 6: Prepare one short explanation that matches your proof.
If you are flying into Singapore and onward to Ho Chi Minh City, you should be able to say: “We leave Singapore on this date for Vietnam.” That one sentence should match the itinerary exactly.

Step 7: Re-check 24 hours before departure.
Schedule changes and aircraft swaps can alter flight numbers and times. If your onward flight out of Auckland is shifted by a day, you want the updated itinerary before you reach the airport.

The “Timatic Moment.”

Most check-in desks rely on a rule database that tells them what documents are required for your nationality, destination, and transit points. You rarely see the screen. You feel the result.

If the database says “onward ticket required” for a one-way to Bali under visa on arrival, the agent may not negotiate. They may simply say, “We need proof you will depart Indonesia.” That is a system decision, not a personal opinion.

If the database flags a transit complication, the agent may treat your itinerary as invalid even when you believe you qualify. For example, on a route from Casablanca to Madrid via London, the airline may focus on UK transit conditions for your passport, even if you never leave the airport.

When you hit this moment, your best move is to reduce ambiguity, not argue theory. Show proof that clearly satisfies the same rule the system is pointing to.

Here is a practical way to handle it without turning the counter into a debate:

Ask one focused question: “Is the system asking for onward travel proof, or is it asking about transit permission?”
Then show the document that matches that category.
If needed, ask for a supervisor only after you have the correct proof ready, because escalation without proof often ends in the same denial.

The Document Hygiene

Airlines reject proof for small reasons because small reasons are easy to defend operationally.

Name matching is a frequent trigger. If your passport says “Maria Teresa Santos” and your onward shows “Maria Santos,” the agent may treat it as not yours. This happens often on routes to the United States and Canada, where systems are strict about passenger identity fields.

Date confusion is another. If your onward out of Tokyo is dated correctly, but the itinerary PDF is in a different time zone and shows a different date line, the agent may hesitate. That hesitation matters when boarding is closing.

Flight status matters more than people expect. If your proof shows a flight that was canceled last month, even by a different airline, your document looks stale. On routes into Singapore and Australia, stale proof can trigger a request for a replacement before boarding passes are released.

Duplicate itineraries can also backfire. If you show two different onward flights out of Bangkok, the agent may ask which one you will take, and then question whether either is real. Present one clean plan for the rule you are satisfying.

Transit city mismatches are common with open-jaw travel. If you are entering the Schengen Area via Vienna but your return shows departure from Prague, that can be fine, but the airline desk may ask how you will travel between them. If you do not want that conversation, keep the exit simple or carry a clear internal travel note that matches your dates.

A quick “counter-ready” checklist that reduces friction:

• Your itinerary shows your full name in the same order as your passport.

• Your exit date is inside the stay window for the country you land in first.

• Your onward or return flight avoids a transit permission trap for your passport.

• Your PDF shows flight number, route, and date on one page.

• You have one primary itinerary to show, not three variations.

Last-Minute Mumbai Departure With a One-Way Ticket and an E-Visa Approval Email

You are departing from Mumbai tonight on a one-way flight to Phuket with a connection. You have a Thailand eVisa approval email on your phone, and you assume that is enough to board.

At the counter, the agent asks for proof of onward travel. This is common on one-way entries where the airline wants confirmation that you will depart Thailand within the permitted stay.

In this moment, the eVisa email solves only one problem. It supports your right to seek entry. It does not automatically answer the airline’s “exit plan” check.

We fix it by matching the request exactly. If the agent is asking for onward proof, you show an onward flight out of Thailand that sits inside your intended stay. You keep it simple. One itinerary. One date. One destination you can plausibly reach next.

Then we keep the explanation tight. “We leave Thailand on this date. Here is the flight.” If the agent asks why the ticket is separate from your inbound booking, you say it is a multi-stop trip, and the onward is the confirmed exit from Thailand.

If online check-in was blocked earlier, you treat that as a signal that the airline’s system requires onward proof for this route, and you prepare the document before you reach the desk next time.

Airline checks are predictable once you treat them as rule-driven, which sets us up for the edge cases where either ticket type can still backfire even when it looks correct on paper.

Exceptions, Risks, and Uncommon Cases Where Either Ticket Can Backfire

Even with a valid visa or waiver, the shape of your flight plan can trigger extra checks. This section covers the less obvious situations where the wrong “proof style” creates friction, and how to adjust without changing the truth of your trip.

The Return Ticket Trap: When Round-Trip Makes You Look Less Credible

A round-trip can look weaker when it conflicts with the kind of stay you are actually making.

If you enter Germany on a national long-stay student visa, a round-trip “in and out” a few weeks apart can look like you are not truly relocating, or like you plan to leave and re-enter repeatedly. Some officers will not care, but it can still invite questions you did not need.

If you enter the United States on a K-1 fiancé(e) visa or a work-authorized status, a return dated soon after arrival can signal confusion about your plan. That can lead to extra questioning at the port of entry about whether you understand your own status.

If you enter Canada on a work permit and show a return flight dated beyond a typical vacation timeframe, an officer may ask whether you intend to maintain residence elsewhere. That is not automatically a problem, but it can cause a longer interview if your purpose is “starting work,” and your ticket looks like “extended travel.”

Round-trips can also look suspicious when the return is too perfect compared to the rest of your file. A UK Standard Visitor application that says “flexible travel dates” but includes a sharply fixed return that sits exactly on the last day of a stated leave approval can lead a caseworker to probe whether your itinerary is constructed rather than planned.

We can avoid the return trap by matching the round-trip style to a situation where round-trips are normal. Tourism, short business visits, and single-event travel are the safest homes for a return ticket.

The “Onward Ticket Trap”: When Onward Looks Like Avoidance

Onward proof can fail when it looks like a placeholder rather than a real plan.

A common issue is an onward flight to a country you cannot enter. If you show Paris to Algiers but you do not hold the visa required for your nationality, the onward journey can look like “paper compliance,” and immigration may question your real intent.

Another issue is an outcome that looks operationally impossible. If you land in Tokyo Haneda and your onward departure is at Narita three hours later, the flight exists, but the plan does not. A border officer may not compute train times, but airline staff and experienced officers do notice these mismatches.

Onward can also look evasive when it is inconsistent with your stated purpose. If you say you are visiting friends in Toronto for two weeks but your onward departure is in three days to Cancún, the officer may ask which trip is real and why your story changed.

We can keep onward credible by using an onward destination that fits the route, fits your permissions, and fits the amount of time you say you will spend in the country you are entering.

High-Scrutiny Profiles

Some ticket patterns raise questions even when everything is lawful. This is about how your itinerary looks, not who you are.

Frequent short trips can trigger “why so many entries.” If you have entered the Schengen Area multiple times recently for near-maximum stays, an onward flight that departs right before the limit can bring extra scrutiny. Officers may ask about your work schedule and residence ties.

Repeated one-way entries are another pattern. If you enter Thailand often on one-way tickets and then show last-minute onward flights, airlines may push harder for proof at check-in because the pattern suggests a higher risk in their systems.

Border runs also change how tickets are interpreted. If you exit and re-enter Malaysia every few weeks, showing an onward flight that looks like a quick loop can trigger questions about whether you are effectively living there without the right status.

Here is the practical implication. When your profile is “high movement,” the best ticket is usually the one that looks most ordinary for your entry basis. On waivers, that often means a clear exit that is easy to verify. On long-stay permits, that often means a one-way or a ticket that matches your relocation story.

Long-Stay Entries: What “Proof” Looks Like Here

Long-stay categories change the logic. Many travelers overuse return tickets for long-stay visas because they assume “round-trip equals safe.” That is not always the cleanest signal.

For a German national visa student entry, a one-way into Berlin is normal. If you want to show future travel, it is often better to keep it separate from “proof of compliance” and avoid presenting it as your exit plan from Germany.

For an Australian Working Holiday visa, some travelers arrive with a one-way ticket because they plan flexible travel and work. Airlines may still request proof that you can leave Australia eventually, depending on your passport and route. In that case, an onward flight out of Australia can be helpful, but it should look like a plausible next stop, not a token flight that conflicts with your first-month plans.

For a Canadian study permit entry, a one-way ticket can match the reality of moving for school. If you carry a return that departs before your program start date, it can create confusion at the desk because it looks like you do not intend to study.

For New Zealand long stays, officers often care about whether you understand your conditions and can support yourself. A ticket that suggests you plan to depart immediately can undermine that story.

We can treat long-stay proof like this:

Use a one-way if it matches the visa category’s normal travel pattern.
Use an onward only when the airline system requires it, and you can make it plausible.
Avoid showing a return that contradicts the purpose of your long-stay entry.

Myth-Busting Without Fluff: Things That Sound True and Still Get People in Trouble

“My airline never checks onward proof.”
Airlines vary by route, policy, and even shift supervisor. A route into Bali can be strict on one carrier and lighter on another, and that can change seasonally.

“A return ticket guarantees entry.”
A return helps, but it does not override weak purpose, inconsistent answers, or a mismatch with your permitted stay. A Schengen return dated after your granted days still creates a problem.

“Any onward flight is fine.”
The destination and the path matter. An onward to a country you cannot enter or an onward that requires an impossible transfer can be treated as not credible, especially at check-in.

“If immigration does not ask, the ticket does not matter.”
Airlines can block boarding before immigration has a chance to be flexible, which is why ticket strategy has to consider the departure airport and airline enforcement.

Visa Applicant Mistake Checklist: The 12 Errors That Trigger Preventable Friction

Use this checklist when your goal is a smooth check-in and clean immigration logic.

1. Your exit date sits outside the permitted stay you are requesting at entry.

2. Your exit date conflicts with visa validity dates, such as returning before the visa start.

3. Your onward destination requires a visa you do not have, or entry you cannot plausibly obtain.

4. Your onward or return includes a transit point that can require a transit visa for your passport.

5. Your itinerary shows an airport change with no realistic transfer time.

6. Your return departs from a city you never mentioned in your visa application itinerary.

7. Your onward departs from a different city than your plan without a believable internal travel path.

8. Your name format differs across bookings, especially missing middle names or swapped surname order.

9. Your flight details are stale due to schedule changes, and you carry an older PDF.

10. You present multiple conflicting itineraries at check-in, and the agent cannot tell which is real.

11. Your ticket timing is inconsistent with your stated purpose, like a “two-week holiday” with a three-day extension.

12. Your exit plan looks like a loop designed only to satisfy a rule, not a route a real traveler would choose.

If you spot one of these issues, fix the weakest link first. It is usually the exit date relative to the permitted stay, or the feasibility of reaching the flight you are showing.

Once you can spot these traps, the next move is knowing how to repair your itinerary fast when you have already booked the wrong ticket type.

You Booked the Wrong Flight Ticket—Now What?

If your flight ticket does not match what the airline desk or passport control expects, you do not need to rebuild your whole trip. You need one clean adjustment that proves you will leave the destination country within the required time frame.

If You Bought a Return but Need Onward: The Cleanest Conversion Paths

This usually happens when your return flight ticket makes sense to you, but the rule being applied is about onward travel. A classic case is a Schengen entry where you fly into France, but your subsequent destination is outside Schengen, so staff want an onward travel ticket that exits the zone.

It also happens on routes where many airlines treat a one-way shape as higher risk. If you show a round-trip that you do not plan to use, you can still face questions because the ticket does not align with your stated onward journey.

We fix this by building proof that matches the legal requirement being checked for that particular country, not the flight pattern you originally booked.

Change Return to Onward vs Add a Separate Onward Leg

If your airline ticket can be changed, a multi-city edit is often the cleanest option. You convert “home to Paris to home” into “home to Paris” plus an onward flight ticket like “Paris to Istanbul” that sits inside your specified time frame for Schengen stay.

If your return is expensive to modify, adding a separate onward ticket can be simpler, especially when the carrier is checking only for an exit from the visited country. The key is to avoid creating two competing exit stories at check-in.

How To Keep The Story Consistent Across Documents You’ve Already Submitted

Treat this like document control. You want one current plan that every checkpoint can read in seconds.

If you applied for a tourist visa for Italy, make sure your entry and exit dates still match the dates written in the application form and cover letter. If you shift your exit city, ensure the internal route is believable for your travel visa and does not contradict the main-destination logic.

For Schengen, your most important consistency points are entry date, exit date, and where you spend the most nights. If you add an onward flight out of Spain but your itinerary says you never go to Spain, you created a mismatch that can lead to extra questions from immigration authorities.

For the UK, consistency often gets tested through basic timeline questions at arrival. If you now show an onward to a third country, your explanation must still support a temporary stay in the UK and a clear exit date.

From personal experience, we see people get stuck not because they lack proof, but because they carry multiple PDFs. Keep one file that shows immigration authorities your current exit plan, and archive older versions so you do not accidentally present conflicting dates.

If You Bought Onward But Should Have Returned: Fastest Ways to De-Risk

Sometimes onward proof exists, but it does not reduce risk at check-in. This is common with a one-way ticket into a country on a visa waiver, where a return ticket looks more normal for short stays.

If you are entering Canada on an eTA for a short visit, an onward to a random third country can trigger “why that route” questions, while a simple round-trip can make the check-in decision faster.

If you are flying into Japan visa-free for a defined holiday, a return can support the “fixed end date” story better than an onward that suggests you are moving through Asia without a clear plan.

We aim for the simplest valid ticket that matches the entry basis you are using and the amount of time you claim you will stay.

Adding a Return That Fits Your Intended Stay

First, anchor your return to the stay you can defend at the border.

If your plan is 12 days in Spain under the Schengen short stay, choose a return that departs within that window, from a city you can realistically reach based on your route. If your plan is a week in Costa Rica under visitor entry, a return dated inside that permission window can remove airline pushback on a one-way.

Second, avoid returns that create transit problems. A return that requires a transit you cannot legally take can get you blocked before boarding, which is how people end up with denied entry outcomes without ever reaching immigration officers.

Third, keep the return aligned with the purpose. A short business visit should not show a return months later unless you can explain why the time frame is that long.

Avoiding Two Exits That Confuse Staff

Two exits confuse check-in agents when they cannot tell which segment satisfies the rule. If you hold an onward travel ticket plus a separate later return, pick one to present as the exit proof for the first entry you are making.

At the counter, be ready with one sentence that matches the document:

“We leave this country on this plane ticket, and the later flight is after our subsequent destination.”

This works when your onward ticket is the one that exits the country you are entering first, and the dates fit the immigration rules for that stay.

If staff ask why you have two bookings, do not over-explain. Confirm which flight is your exit from the country you are entering, and show that page.

Timing Strategy: When to Lock It In Relative to Visa Appointments and Departure

If you are in visa processing for Schengen or the UK, lock your dates early enough that your supporting documents do not keep changing. Frequent tweaks can make your file look unstable, even when the changes are harmless.

If you are traveling abroad on a visa waiver, the bigger risk is departure-day enforcement. Lock the proof you will show at check-in at least a day before travel, then re-check the segment status and flight number.

Some countries require a clear exit plan before boarding pass issuance, and that is why timing matters more for the airline than for the border.

Don’t Create a Timeline Where Your Itinerary “Updates Itself” Every 48 Hours

Constant updates create confusion under pressure. You end up with three versions of the same airline ticket in your phone, and the wrong one gets shown at the desk.

This is also where people make risky choices. If you start faking proof to calm an agent, you can land in serious trouble, because a fake ticket is not the same as verifiable dummy tickets used correctly for documentation. Some countries explicitly state penalties for document fraud, and airlines can refuse boarding if they detect inconsistencies.

Keep your plan stable. Make one change that improves coherence, then stop editing unless a real schedule change forces you.

How To Keep Changes Defensible If Asked

If immigration officials ask why an exit city changed, tie it to logistics, not to “because we needed proof.” Example: “We changed our route to exit from the last city we will visit.”

If an airline asks why your exit is on a separate booking, explain it as a multi-stop plan, then point to the segment that satisfies the requirement. Your goal is to provide proof, not tell your whole itinerary story.

If you are a digital nomad-style traveler with flexible plans, keep your explanation grounded in dates and permissions. “We will stay for two weeks and depart on this date” is clearer than “we will see what happens.”

If you need a dummy flight ticket, legal for embassy use, and you want a plane flight ticket you can present as a verifiable flight booking, DummyFlights.com offers instantly verifiable reservations, a PNR with PDF, unlimited date changes, transparent pricing of $15 (~₹1,300), is trusted worldwide for visa use, and accepts credit cards.

Edge cases usually come down to what a carrier can verify quickly and what the destination’s entry logic expects across many countries, because not all countries apply checks the same way.

Is a Bus/Train Ticket an Acceptable “Onward” for My Route?

Sometimes, yes, but it depends on the checkpoint. At airline check-in, a bus or train ticket can be harder to validate than a flight ticket, so staff may still ask for an onward flight even if your onward journey is overland.

If you rely on a bus ticket, make sure it is in your name and clearly dated. If you are showing overland travel, carry a bus ticket showing the route and time, and keep it inside the stay limit of the country you are entering.

Does An Open-Jaw Round-Trip Count As A Return?

Often, yes, when it is readable. An open-jaw can function like a return if it clearly shows you leaving within the permitted time frame, and it fits your route. This works best when your entry city and exit city match your actual plan.

If I’m Transiting, Who Can Demand Onward Proof?

The operating airline can demand proof before boarding, and transit conditions can amplify checks. This is why you should not assume “immigration will decide later.” Some routes get flagged because countries require proof in the airline rule systems, even if border questioning is light.

What If My Exit Is by Cruise/Ferry—How Do I Show It Cleanly?

Carry official documentation that proves the departure date and destination. Airlines may still prefer an airline-style exit record because it is easier to verify, so keep a clear flight option available if your route is known for strict enforcement.

If you are flying out of New Delhi on a complex international travel itinerary with a sea exit later, keep the first country’s exit plan simple, so your first flight does not stall at check-in.

With the fix plan in place, the next step is turning your ticket choice into a calm, consistent approach you can reuse for future trips across other countries.

Onward Ticket vs Return Ticket: Make Your Exit Plan Obvious

When you fly into places like Amsterdam for Schengen, London for the UK, or Bangkok on a short stay, the fastest wins come from one clear choice: an onward ticket or a return ticket that matches your permitted stay and your actual route. We built the decision around what airline staff and immigration officers verify in seconds, not what feels safest on paper.

Keep one clean, current itinerary PDF. Make sure it shows you leaving the destination country inside the specified time frame, with a routing you can explain in one sentence. If you are traveling soon, review your booking today and fix any date or transit mismatches before you reach the airport.

Before setting off on your journey, taking a moment to reinforce your documentation strategy ensures everything aligns smoothly at every checkpoint. Understanding what is a dummy ticket and how it functions as reliable proof of onward travel is essential for modern travelers facing strict verification processes. These specially prepared reservations provide embassy-approved documentation that effectively demonstrates your commitment to departing within permitted timeframes, offering a trustworthy alternative when flexible plans are needed. Their reliability comes from containing all standard reservation elements that officials expect to see, making them a practical choice for visa applications and airport presentations alike. For the best results, always select options that match your specific itinerary details precisely. This attention to detail helps build a narrative of responsible travel planning. If your upcoming trip involves visa-sensitive destinations, having this type of proof ready can make the difference between a stressful experience and a seamless one. Take action today by preparing your materials thoroughly for a successful and worry-free application process.

Why Travelers Trust DummyFlights.com

DummyFlights.com has been helping travelers since 2019 with a clear focus on verifiable dummy ticket reservations only. The dedicated support team is a real registered business that has supported over 50,000 visa applicants with secure online payment and instant PDF delivery. Every reservation includes a stable PNR that travelers can verify themselves before submission, and the platform offers 24/7 customer support to answer questions at any stage of the visa process. DummyFlights.com never uses automated or fake tickets — every document is generated through legitimate airline reservation systems and can be reissued unlimited times at no extra cost if your plans change. This niche expertise and transparent process is why thousands of applicants return for every new visa application.
 

What Travelers Are Saying

★★★★★

“My dummy ticket for visa was verified instantly at the embassy — saved my Schengen trip!”

Priya • DEL → FRA

★★★★★

“Unlimited reissues and instant PDF — perfect when my Japan appointment moved.”

Maria • MEX → MAD

★★★★★

“PNR checked on the spot at VFS — zero issues with my dummy ticket for visa.”

Ahmed • CAI → IST